Hamlet and today’s poiltical climate

William Shakespeare courtesy of Wikipedia

Hamlet, Prince of Denmark could not run for political office today. We like our politicians to express certainty, even when we know there are many things most of us cannot feel absolutely certain about. We carry around at least a few doubts close to the heart, but we expect our leaders to hold no doubts when they make decisions of national importance.  Remember the George Bushism? “I’m the decider and I decide what is best.” Many look to politicians for that kind confidence (though better expressed).

In her book Being Wrong, in the chapter, “The Allure of Certainty,” Kathryn Schulz talks about our current dislike of uncertainty when we see it in political candidates, as shown by Senator John Kerry‘s downfall as a presidential candidate, as well as our frustration with the unwillingness of “the undecided voter” to take sides. Neither of these discussions offered much in the way of new insights. But her description of how we treat a fictional character, “Hamlet,” the universally known Shakespearean protagonist, opened my eyes to something I had never considered before.  Students of English literature and literary critics have labeled Hamlet weak and indecisive for centuries, but she says this was not always so.

“As the critic Harold Jenkins has observed, for at least the first 150 years of his literary life, Hamlet was generally viewed as ‘vigorous, bold and heroic’ — a victim of his circumstances, not his psyche.  But then, in the eighteenth century, the writer James Boswell remarked on ‘that irresolution which forms so marked a part of [Hamlet’s] character,’ and the description stuck. Over the next hundred years…the Hamlet we know today was born: a man so paralyzed by indecision that he is unable to take action.” Ms. Schulz asks why anyone would not think it reasonable for a leader to hesitate and think twice before killing his stepfather (patricide) and king (regicide), especially when a ghost intructed him to commit the crimes. And she wonders, “What was it in the political and cultural climate of the moment that suddenly made action and conviction, thought and doubt such transfixing issues?”  Whatever was responsible then is still acting today.

Why people feel certain, even in the face of contradictory evidence, is the theme of the book:  we usually believe we’re right and we have a great fear of being wrong. Certainty is our way of avoiding a confrontation with the feeling of fear.  Meanwhile, we prefer leaders who also avoid that confrontation.  Hamlet wouldn’t make it through a primary.

About stillalife

I retired June 30, 2010 after working for 40 years in the field of education and most recently doing school public relations/community outreach in a mid-size urban school district. I wrote for superintendents and school board members. Now I'm writing for me and I hope for you. In this blog, I offer my own views coupled with the latest research on how to preserve our physical and mental health as we age, delve into issues most of us over 50 can relate to like noticing wrinkles and forgetting where we left our keys, discuss the pros and cons of different ways to engage our minds and bodies after we leave the workplace, and throw in an occasional book review, all peppered with a touch of humor, irony, and just plain silliness. Also, I'm on the third draft of my second novel since retirement.
This entry was posted in current events/themes and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s